March Sadness

Another college basketball season has came and gone. It was a great season for the Buckeyes as they began the season 24-0 and grabbed the weekly #1 ranking once the other favorites had fallen. The streak was finally snapped in February with disappointing losses in two tough road games. But they bounced back and shifted to a higher gear on March 1st when Jon Diebler lit up Penn State with 10 three pointers. In the next game, the Bucks handed Wisconsin a nearly 30 point drubbing in return for breaking the streak a month earlier. They finished the regular season with a remarkable 32-2 and regained the national #1 rank.

Taking the top seed into the Big Ten Tournament they had a bye in the first round and dispatched a very determined Northwestern team in OT in the second. This put OSU up against Michigan in the semifinal. I knew it’d be well worth the drive over to Indy to see the Buckeyes put a third beatdown on the Blue this season. The tournament vibe was very cool in Indianapolis and I regret not making it over in past years. The Wolverines kept things close in the first half, but failed to score for a large chunk of the second half. Michigan tried to pull close in the end, but the Buckeyes clinched the win in front of the large fanbase in the stands.

We stuck around to watch the second game, where Penn State continued its surprising tourney run over much favored Michigan State. From their team’s gutsy play, the Penn State student section got a lot of love, despite their position up in the rafters. Unfortunately their ride would end the following day, as OSU defeated Penn State in the Big Ten final.

As the NCAA brackets were announced it was no great surprise that the Buckeyes were handed the number one overall seed, but that didn’t make it any less sweet. Most people have quickly forgotten that three years earlier the Buckeyes missed the NCAA tourney and played in (and won) the NIT tournament. The following year, they suffered a shocking NCAA first round loss to a scrappy Siena team in double OT. Then last year, with large hopes pinned on team leader Evan Turner, the Buckeyes failed to make it past Tennessee in the sweet 16. This year’s team had more talent, and a win-loss record to prove it. Filling out brackets was an unusual treat. Usually you have you “dream” bracket where your team wins it all, and your “real” bracket which you hope will actually win you some money. This was one of those extremely rare years where those brackets could be the same. I got the most out of it by entering over a dozen brackets in various pools around the web.

Well, so much for that. After very solid first and second round wins, against 16 seed Texas San Antonio and 8 seed George Mason, the Buckeyes hit a brick wall in the sweet 16. And it looked like this guy:

Kentucky fought OSU tooth and nail and finished two points ahead when time expired. It was real disappointment for Buckeye Nation – not that we’re not used to it, heck maybe even half expecting it. High ranked teams were falling left and right in the tourney, but still most figured Ohio State would survive to fight North Carolina, then UConn, then maybe Kansas. For Dielber, David Lighty, and Dallas Lauderdale it was their final game, having received diplomas that month. After early exits by Oden, Koufos, Cook, Conley Jr., and most recently Turner, it was great to see all three of these guys play out their career. The Bucks will be much younger next year, but with Sully leading them, it’ll be fun to watch them back at it in the fall.

Filed under Sports

Oscarpalooza 2011

Once again Oscar time has rolled around and there’s another big batch of films to catch up with. Last year’s movies included some guilty pleasures, such as Kick Ass which took me totally by surprise and Tron: Legacy which finally fulfilled its long anticipation. But most of the nominated films had great things to offer, too.


The Social Network

I found it funny it took me almost a year to watch just about the only movie ever made related to my profession. Cops, doctors, lawyers…they get all screen time; web developers, um, not so much. The few movies that are about computer programmers are about hackers (and ok, there’s an element of that in this one), and I get it, there’s just not much drama in making web pages. But The Social Network is unique. It’s to be expected that some facts were probably amped up for the film’s benefit, but there’s still a heck of a lot of drama that unfolded as Facebook grew from a dorm room idea to its first million users (it’s now at 500 million as of last summer). It was awesome to see how simply frustration with girls and some keen thinking brought about the second largest online property of our time. I really give David Fincher credit for getting the technical details, too. While things never get too deep, the mentions of Apache configuratons, MySQL clusters, and Perl scripts are all spot on. There were also great moments of cinematography (I especially liked surreal the tilt shift rowing sequence), even if scenes with the fake cold breath vapor was noticeable. Last, but not least, Trent Reznor and Atticus Ross provided an amazing soundtrack (one of my two favorites of the year). The Social Network should fare very well on Oscar night – and millions of people will comment about it on Zuckerburg’s little website.

My Pick: Best Picture! Best Music (original score), David Fincher for Best Director, and Aaron Sorkin for the Best Adapted Screenplay.

Inception

Doesn’t it seem like the premise for this story came from A Nightmare on Elm Street except someone decided you only wake up when you die in your sleep. Way to ruin that whole franchise! :) There was so much buzz this year about how this movie was complex and mind warping. To be honest, once I managed to suspend disbelief in the idea of “dream sharing” (and it’s odd framework of rules) I found it was very clearly laid out. Kudos to Nolan because I could see it becoming a mess under a different director. If anything the movie was a bit heavy handed with keeping the logistics clear (ok, we’re in this person’s dream now, then we’re going into this dream, and then this is how we’ll wake, etc). The theme of dream worlds and alternate realities has been done before, but this is told as a very fresh tale by involving intellectual theft and time dilation. Some of the acting is a little flat in my opinion, but far from distractingly bad. Inception is creative, thought-provoking, well shot, and extremely well edited. To the last point, the editing on the final scene was masterful. With a sudden cut to black we question whether we ended up in reality and if the spinning top was about to topple. But Nolan is telling us it doesn’t even matter as Matt Damon’s character stops watching his totem to focus on his kids. As the kids played, I imagined they might be singing “Row, row, row your boat…”

My Pick: Best Writing (original screenplay), and possibly Best Cinematography and Visual Effects.

True Grit

I’ll admit it. I’m not much for westerns. I never read “True Grit” the book, nor watched the John Wayne movie. The Coen brothers’ 2010 remake doesn’t make me want to do either. The story of pursuit and revenge in the old west countryside of Arkansas, just wasn’t too thrilling for me. Bridges, Damon, and Hailee Steinfeld (as Maddie) were all fine, but pretty flat in my opinion. Also, the source material is probably to blame, but the movie ends awkwardly by stumbling into another extra chapter after the climax; and then an epilogue which was unnecessary in my opinion.

127 Hours

I don’t know if Aron Ralston is insane or insanely brave, but I do know he’s an idiot for setting off solo for a weekend climb. I also know that James Franco is a heck of an actor. With him, the film is unsettling and hard to watch, but without him it’d just be unwatchable. Franco’s range of emotions really go far to make the movie move along, but ultimately it feel like the movie doesn’t cover much ground. I’m guessing this is in part because everyone knows the basics of the story going into it, and really there’s not much to be told beyond that. I did think the cinematography (for which it was not nominated) was nice, and the editing (for which it was) really captured Franco’s spiraling despair. Franco deserves strong consideration for Best Leading Actor, but to me the film’s in the lower half of the Best Picture noms.

My Pick: Best Film Editing and a coin flip for Franco for Best Actor.

Black Swan

Black Swan is definitely a odd little pic. It reminded me of Single White Female if Bridget Fonda was the crazy one. Portman does a great job of portraying a character who closes in on perfection while steadily losing grasp of everything around her. The supporting cast is all over the top, from the femme fatale Kunis, to the maniacal director and the crazy abusive mother, but assuming it’s all from Nina’s eyes, it works. The story isn’t all together unpredictable, but there’s enough rawness and distortion to keep the viewer off balanced and engaged. The moral I came away with was just eat a damn sammitch and you may not go bat shit crazy.

My Pick: Portman is the best I’ve seen for Best Actress, but I haven’t yet watched Annette Bening in The Kids Are All Right.

The King’s Speech

This movie seems a bit like an Oscar sequel (prequel) to 2006′s The Queen in that it pulls back the veil of British royalty and shows how they coped during turbulent times. And as with that movie, I found I enjoyed The King’s Speech a few notches more than I expected. In this case, it’s the acting of Colin Firth and Geoffrey Rush that really make the film. Firth is awesome as he swings from vulnerable and unsure stammering to frustrated and angry moments. But in my opinion, Rush is the real heart of the picture. His presence paces and guides the film, and occasionally relieves us with levity, just as his character does with Bertie. One does wonder whether George VI’s affliction and ascension were as historically significant as portrayed, but the movie certainly works on a more personal level.

My Pick: Rush for Best Supporting Actor. Firth in a dead heat with Franco for Best Actor. Runner up for Best Picture and Tom Hooper as runner up for Best Director.

The Fighter

Mark Wahlberg does a good job with this depiction of a boxer’s unlikely rise to the top, but it’s the supporting cast that delivers this movies into Oscar contention. Christian Bale, Amy Adams, and Melissa Leo are all nominated for their contributions. To me, Bale’s crack addict antics came off a little over the top at times. I think he’s naturally pretty intensive, so he could have toned it down a notch. Adams on the other hand is a little low key for a fairly pivotal character. The real standout was Leo as Micky’s, sometimes misguided, mother. Her character is gritty, flawed, and very believable. As a whole, I think the film is all too predictable and follows the boxing movie formula, but it’s still a good treatment of a true story.

My Pick: Leo for Best Supporting Actress.

Filed under Movies

Leaving thirty-something in the Dust

Ok, I’m not even close to start commenting on what this year’s birthday brings. Those self-deprecating reflections can wait a few months. But it is time to put out one of my ambitions for this landmark year:

  • to complete 40 kilometers of competitive racing.

Last year I finally returned to running, and ran in two 5Ks. I think two races is about as much as I’ve ever run in a year, but I’d hoped to do more. Unfortunately the suffocating summer heat and the manic rush toward Halloween cut the running season much shorter than I planned. Well, this year I plan to pound the pavement for nearly a marathon worth of miles. I’m already registered for Cincy’s Flying Pig 10k in March and I’m eying races in Indianapolis and San Francisco, along with some less traditional racing events. In part, it’s just a ploy to keep exercising through the year, after all 40k of racing should mean well over a hundred k of training. More importantly, I think there will be some good adventures to be had.

Filed under Sports

Returning to the Grid

I’d just finished sixth grade when the original TRON was released, and I was probably as close to the target audience as you could get. As a sci-fi watching, video game loving kid just beginning to learn about computers and programming it’s no surprise it was one of my favorite childhood movies. Young enough to suspend disbelief as far as necessary, I was blown away with the imaginative struggle between programs, the MCP, and the intervening User. The bright neon geometric visuals were stunning (for the time) and the soundtrack bubbled with the sounds of futuristic synthesizers. My friends and I even would play out disk wars with frisbees and light cycle battles on bicycles.

Fast-forward nearly thirty years and Disney finally came around to making the sequel, TRON: Legacy. Although I waited months in anticipation of its release, I was fairly fearful the new movie would fall short. The visuals were sure to be amazing, but could they really form a decent story that sat alongside the original? Would this simply be a new unrelated chapter about The Grid? Well, most of those fears derezzed when the trailers surfaced showing Jeff Bridges as Flynn.

Without going into plotlines or spoilers, Disney pulls the sequel off pretty darn well. Not only does the plot sit nicely with the original, but it’s cleverly framed around the actual elapsed time since the first story. They really seem to embrace fanboy skeptics like me with nod after nod to the original. Little things like hacking the massive Encom door (and the exact dialog delivered again as it opens), the dusty handheld football game in Flynn’s office, Journey still playing on the arcade jukebox, and my favorite, the sole original style light cycle (with canopy and skinny rear wheel). Like Disney gravitates to, the main theme is pretty standard (father and son, coming of age, yada), but there are at least allusions to deeper ideas of science and religion and freedom of information. I will say the story narrowly escapes from getting too big for itself – the backstory of the Isos suffers for the sake of brevity – but the pacing holds things together pretty well.

The film’s visuals are amazing as expected. I saw the film in IMAX 3D and have to admit it was worth the $15 ticket. The IRL scenes are shot in 2D, so the transition to the world of The Grid is even more impressive. The 3D treatment was sharp, but subtle and avoided gimmicks – even in action sequences. And even though the CG used to transform Bridges into his much younger self wasn’t perfect, it was stilling amazing every time he hit the screen.

There were not only countless elements that echoed the original TRON, but plenty of reflections of other movies and characters. How could you not think of Luke in the Millennium Falcon when Sam is in the gun turret? And while Michael Sheen’s character, Castor, was certainly a riff on Bowie’s flamboyant Ziggy Stardust, I immediately thought of the Merovingian and Persephone from The Matrix Revolutions (a trilogy which probably owes much to TRON) when I saw him and Gem.
Lastly, the soundtrack (and sound design!) was fantastic. When I first heard Daft Punk was enlisted for the score I thought it was a perfect fit, except I was afraid the entire movie would be filled with pulsating club grooves. That’d be great as a DP album, but probably not so effective as a soundtrack. While there are some killer beats, the French duo really nailed it by crafting great symphonic electonica pieces I wouldn’t have expected from them. And even though I knew it was coming, their cameo may just have been my favorite film moment of the year.

Sure, it’s not quite the cinematic fine dining of Oscar winners, but in watching the flick, I felt a lot like the CG’d Bridges – transformed back to my much younger self.

End of line.

Filed under Movies